- The Short Answer: No Public Cut Score Exists
- What Is and Isn't Verified About C-310 Scoring
- How Silver and Gold Change What "Passing" Means
- Local Pass Rules You Might Encounter
- Seven Standards You Must Clear, Not Average Away
- Check Availability Before You Chase a Number
- Building a Readiness Standard Without a Published Cut Score
- Frequently Asked Questions
- No universal numerical cut score for C-310 Ethernet Communications 2 has been publicly verified, so any single "passing percentage" you see online is...
- Silver requires passing an online proctored written exam; Gold adds an observed hands-on performance on SACA-approved equipment.
- CNM's 70% Silver rule is a local general policy, not a confirmed national C-310 standard.
- SACA publishes seven C-310 standards without percentages, so you cannot safely skip any of them.
The Short Answer: No Public Cut Score Exists
If you searched for the C-310 passing score hoping for a clean number like "70%" or "750 out of 1000," here is the honest answer: no universal numerical cut score for C-310 (Ethernet Communications 2) has been publicly verified. The Smart Automation Certification Alliance (SACA), which governs and administers this credential, does not publish a percentage threshold, a scaled-score range, or a scored-item count for the C-310 written assessment in any public source reviewed for this article.
That matters because many pages that rank for this query quietly import a number from somewhere else. "C-310" is a code shared by several unrelated credentials, and a passing score from one of them has no bearing on Ethernet Communications 2. This guide covers only the SACA micro-credential built around PLC Ethernet messaging, distributed I/O, VFD communications, VLANs, wireless Ethernet, and industrial network troubleshooting. If you want a broader orientation first, start with What Is C-310? or What Is C-310 Certification?.
What we can do is lay out what is verified, what is local policy, what is unknown, and how to prepare so that the unknown number stops being your problem. If you want to start pressure-testing yourself right away, the C-310 practice test site is built around the seven published standards.
What Is and Isn't Verified About C-310 Scoring
Separating confirmed facts from assumptions is the most useful thing a candidate can do here. The table below summarizes the scoring-related details at the time of writing.
| Scoring Detail | Status for C-310 |
|---|---|
| Universal numerical cut score | Not publicly verified |
| Scored vs. unscored item allocation | Not publicly verified |
| Exact question count | Not publicly verified |
| Written-exam duration | Not publicly verified |
| Practical (Gold) assessment duration | Not publicly verified |
| Published domain weights or percentages | None published; the seven standards carry no weights |
| Immediate written results | Supported by indexed issuer text and reviewed process evidence |
| Historical written-exam retake interval | 24 hours in a historical issuer document; local centers may differ |
Notice what is absent: any figure you could confidently write on a flashcard as "the number to beat." The 2019 general pilot timer that appears in older SACA material is not assigned to this later credential, so you should not treat it as a C-310 time limit either.
How Silver and Gold Change What "Passing" Means
Under SACA's general assessment framework, "passing" is not one event. It depends on which level you are pursuing, subject to exact C-310 availability.
Silver: the written knowledge exam
Silver requires success on an online proctored written knowledge examination. Assessment is administered through SACA's portal, authorized member testing centers, and qualified institutional proctors; no separate Pearson VUE, PSI, or Prometric provider is identified. Indexed issuer text and reviewed process evidence indicate immediate written results, so you typically learn the outcome right away rather than waiting for a mailed score report.
Gold: written credential plus observed performance
Gold builds on Silver. It requires the relevant written credential and then successfully observed hands-on performance using SACA-approved equipment. For C-310 this means demonstrating, not just describing, tasks such as getting a PLC to exchange data with distributed Ethernet I/O or configuring an industrial VLAN. The practical element is evaluated by observation, so "passing" Gold is a competence judgment rather than a percentage you can pre-compute.
| Element | Silver | Gold |
|---|---|---|
| Format | Online proctored written knowledge exam | Observed hands-on performance after Silver |
| What "pass" reflects | Success on the written assessment | Knowledge plus performance competence |
| Equipment | None beyond the testing setup | SACA-approved equipment |
| Public numeric threshold | Not verified for C-310 | Not verified for C-310 |
For a deeper look at how the two levels differ in preparation, see the C-310 Study Guide and the C-310 requirements overview.
Local Pass Rules You Might Encounter
Because SACA assessments run through member institutions, you may meet a pass requirement written into your school's or testing site's own policy. The clearest public example comes from Central New Mexico Community College (CNM), whose general SACA Silver page publishes:
- A 70% pass requirement
- Notes and scientific-calculator allowances
- A minimum seven-day retake wait
- Up to five attempts per term
The practical takeaway is to ask your own testing site three questions before exam day: what pass threshold applies, whether notes or calculators are allowed, and how long you must wait to retake. Current C-310 open-book rules, calculator conditions, adaptive delivery, and webcam remote-proctoring requirements remain unverified, so your proctor's answer outranks anything you read online, including here.
Seven Standards You Must Clear, Not Average Away
SACA's public standards selector lists seven C-310 standards (310.01 through 310.07). Because no percentages are published, you cannot responsibly assume any standard is "low weight" and safe to skim. The seven headings are:
Distributed Ethernet I/O (Standard 310.01)
Program and operate a PLC logic project that uses distributed Ethernet I/O.
- Understand how remote I/O modules communicate with the controller over Ethernet
- Be ready to configure, address, and verify distributed I/O in a working project
Explicit Messaging (Standard 310.02)
Program and operate a PLC project that uses explicit messaging via Ethernet.
- Explicit messaging is request/response style, on-demand communication
- Practice reading and writing data between devices through message instructions
Implicit Messaging (Standard 310.03 and 310.04 region)
Program and operate a PLC project that uses implicit messaging via Ethernet.
- Implicit messaging is cyclic, connection-based I/O exchange
- Know the conceptual contrast with explicit messaging, because the source text repeats messaging knowledge across adjacent standards
PLC-VFD Ethernet Communication
Program and operate a PLC-VFD system that uses Ethernet communication.
- Control and monitor a variable frequency drive from the PLC over the network
- Be able to explain what is being exchanged and verify drive behavior
Industrial Network VLAN
Configure and test an industrial network VLAN.
- Segment traffic and confirm that the segmentation actually works
- Testing is part of the standard, not just configuration
Basic IACS Ethernet Troubleshooting
Troubleshoot basic IACS Ethernet network faults.
- Isolate physical, addressing, and configuration faults methodically
Wireless Ethernet Networks
Set up and operate a wireless Ethernet network.
- Bring up and validate a wireless link in an industrial context
Two source quirks are worth knowing so they do not confuse you. Standard 310.03 supplies knowledge indicators without a separate performance-indicator list, and the full response repeats explicit-messaging knowledge under 310.03 and implicit-messaging knowledge under 310.04. These details are preserved here as published rather than silently corrected. A full walkthrough of each content area lives in the C-310 exam domains guide.
Why the six-skill catalog summary still matters
SACA's broader micro-credential description lists six skill phrases: PLC implicit and explicit messaging, PLC distributed I/O, VFD-PLC Ethernet communications, VLAN security, wireless Ethernet networks, and IACS network troubleshooting. The seven detailed standards simply split messaging into two headings. Neither list is weighted, and neither is described as exhaustive exam coverage. Some suppliers describe the credential differently; for instance, X-Cal emphasizes ring/star topology and Layer 3 managed switches. Those supplier-specific details were confirmed on their own page but are not part of SACA's seven standards, so do not let them displace your core preparation.
Check Availability Before You Chase a Number
There is a prior question that matters more than the cut score: can you actually sit this exam right now? A verification hold remains on current production-exam availability and the final current examination version.
The known timeline is short. SACA's March 17, 2025 announcement introduced C-310 into a pilot phase. No later exact C-310 announcement confirming the end of that pilot was verified. The current SACA catalog carries an asterisk beside C-310, and Tech-Labs, a supplier, also marks it with an asterisk plus an "In Development" legend. That is supplier corroboration, not an issuer production-release notice, and the issuer's own legend could not be independently recovered. Course listings and directory entries do not prove that every testing center offers the exam today.
Key Takeaway
Before you invest weeks in preparation, email SACA or your member institution's assessment coordinator and ask three things: is C-310 available for testing at your site, which exam version is current, and what pass standard applies locally. See C-310 exam dates and scheduling for how to frame that conversation.
Also be wary of marketing that implies a "2026 exam revision." Publisher dates and paid question-bank update claims do not establish an official 2026 revision. Years in articles like this one date the editorial guidance, not the exam form.
Building a Readiness Standard Without a Published Cut Score
When the target number is unknown, set your own bar high and tie it to the standards. Because SACA states that preparation methods are flexible and does not require a specific course or training-equipment brand, you can organize practice around the seven standards directly. One compact way to sequence the work:
Distributed I/O and the network foundation
- Distributed I/O is the base the messaging standards sit on, so settle it first
- Practice addressing and verifying remote I/O on real or simulated hardware
Explicit versus implicit messaging
- Study the two models side by side so you can state the difference and use each correctly
- Build one exercise for each, not a blended one
PLC-VFD communication and VLANs
- Control a drive over Ethernet, then configure and test a VLAN
Troubleshooting and wireless
- Practice isolating faults, then bring up a wireless network
- Finish with mixed review across all seven standards
This sequence puts foundational skills first and leaves troubleshooting for later, when you have enough working knowledge to diagnose what breaks. For a fuller version of this approach, see the C-310 Study Guide, and for a sense of effort, the difficulty guide.
A self-set readiness bar
Since you cannot measure yourself against an official percentage, use a conservative personal rule: you are ready for Silver when you can answer mixed questions on all seven standards consistently, with no standard noticeably weaker than the rest, and you are ready for Gold when you can perform each task unaided on approved-style equipment. Regular timed sets from the C-310 practice tests help you see whether your accuracy holds across every standard rather than only your favorites.
What a pass does and doesn't change
Passing is a competency milestone, not a verified salary event. No C-310-holder salary series or earnings premium has been verified, and wages from C-212, generic Ethernet/IP jobs, or broad automation roles should not be transferred to this credential. If return on investment is your concern, read the C-310 ROI analysis and the cost breakdown, which explain how membership-based certification benefits work without inventing a price.
Frequently Asked Questions
No universal numerical cut score for C-310 Ethernet Communications 2 has been publicly verified. SACA does not publish a percentage, scaled score, or scored-item count for this credential. Any specific number you see should be treated as unconfirmed unless it comes from SACA or your testing site.
Not as a confirmed national rule. CNM publishes a 70% pass requirement for its general SACA Silver testing, but that is a local policy. Ask your own testing site what threshold applies to you before assuming it matches.
The exact question count, item-type breakdown, written-exam duration, and practical-assessment duration are not publicly verified for C-310. The 2019 general pilot timer should not be assigned to this later credential, so confirm details with your assessment site.
A historical SACA process document describes a 24-hour retake interval for the written exam, but local policies differ; CNM, for example, requires a minimum seven-day wait and allows up to five attempts per term. Check your testing center's current rule. See the pass rate article for why no outcome statistics are cited here.
Gold is defined by competence rather than a published percentage: it requires the relevant written credential plus successfully observed hands-on performance on SACA-approved equipment. No numeric Gold threshold was verified for C-310.
The most dependable preparation strategy is also the simplest: confirm availability and local rules with SACA or your member institution, then prepare to the seven published standards rather than to an unverified number. For related questions, the requirements guide and the C-310 certification overview are good next reads.